CECAN Presentation at the Political Evaluation and Evaluation Politics Questions and Research Lines Conference in Berlin
CECAN Co-Investigator Ian Christie presented the programme’s aims, projects and achievements to date in a talk at a conference in Berlin on 17th November on the political dimensions of policy evaluation. The event was organised by the University of Bielefeld and the Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin’s Social Research Centre. Delegates included Jonas Schönefeld, of UEA and the University of Darmstadt, who spoke at the 2018 CECAN conference in London in the summer. There was considerable interest in CECAN, and we have several good prospects for collaboration to follow up with German colleagues.
The presentation is available to download here.
We were delighted to have Stuart Astill and Simon Henderson host a CECAN webinar on 16th October on 'Handling subjective views and bringing rigour to contribution analysis: Bayesian Belief Networks and evaluating likelihoods in action'. The webinar illustrated how influence maps analysed using Bayesian Belief Networks can be used to add rigour to contribution analysis (and other evaluative judgements) in situations where subjective views rather than objective outcome data is the main source of knowledge. They also reviewed how a well-planned approach can structure and aggregate subjective views using influence mapping, Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) and conceptions around evaluating likelihoods.
If you were unable to join the webinar, you can watch/listen to the session via our Youtube channel below. Stuart and Simon have also kindly made their slides available for download here.
ESRC has awarded transition funding to CECAN and eight other ESRC research centres to continue their pioneering social science research and to increase the use of their research in policy and practice.
Professor Jennifer Rubin, ESRC’s Executive Chair said: "We are delighted that these nine centres have secured transitional funding. The breadth of social science that these centres of excellence encompass illustrates the strength of UK social science. This funding will support these centres and help set them on a path to long term sustainability. This model for funding social science research centres in partnership with research organisations in the UK recognises their strategic and financial benefits and their potential for making a contribution to better lives nationally and internationally.”
Led by the University of Surrey, this second phase of CECAN will follow seamlessly from the end of the current grant, running from 1st March 2019 for 36 months, to extend and deepen the work developed in the first phase.
CECAN researchers Dr Pete Barbrook-Johnson, Dr Amy Proctor and Dr Adam Hejnowicz presented at the British Science Festival in Hull on 12th September 2018. In a sold-out session exploring how Brexit might affect UK policy evaluation, the audience heard how CECAN research is supporting new approaches to waste crime and rural development policy evaluation before debating complexity and wicked issues in policy evaluation.
Slides from the presentation are available to download here.
CECAN would like to thank Adam Stiles from BEIS, Charles Michaelis from SDS and Mary Anderson from CAG Consultants, for an engaging seminar on their experiences of using process tracing in realist evaluations.
The team delivered a presentation on a pilot scheme they have been working on, to encourage demand side response (DSR) to participate in the capacity market for electricity, using process tracing.
CECAN's Barbara Befani has peer reviewed this work and was involved in the scheme through her work on bayesian updating.
The seminar was filmed and can be viewed below via our Youtube channel.
CECAN were pleased to host a webinar with Dr Martin Reynolds from the Open University on 24th July. Martin presented his work on developmental evaluation, which endeavours to reconfigure evaluation practice away from merely serving purposes of external accountability of policy towards making evaluation integral to the dualistic practice of policy making and policy implementation.
A framework of developmental evaluation was introduced based on a simple heuristic founded on three principles from a tradition of systems thinking in practice – understanding inter-relationships, engaging with multiple perspectives, and reflecting on boundary judgements. Two case stories of developmental evaluation were used to illustrate the workings of the heuristic towards making policy and making policy work.
If you were unable to join the webinar, you can watch/listen to the session via our Youtube channel below. Martin has also kindly made his slides available for download here.